Dynamic Resilience Assessment and Collaborative Reconfiguration of UAV Kill Webs Based on Physical-Logical-Temporal Coupling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65904/3083-3450.2026.02.03Keywords:
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) swarm, Kill Web resilience, collaborative reconfiguration, physical-logical coupling,, emergent effectsAbstract
In highly contested environments, the survivability of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Kill Webs faces severe challenges. Existing evaluations over-rely on static topological connectivity, ignoring physical constraints (distance, energy, latency), often causing a fatal misjudgment: “structural preservation alongside operational paralysis.” To address this, we propose a dynamic resilience assessment and collaborative reconfiguration framework integrated with a “physical-logical-temporal” coupling. First, an effective model based on heterogeneous closed-loop cycles is constructed. A Time-aware Accumulated Normalized Operational Capability (T-ANOC) metric is proposed to rigorously quantify the realistic penalties of reconfiguration latency and spatial attenuation on System-of-Systems (SoS) effectiveness. Second, under resource constraints, a many-to-one collaborative reconfiguration mechanism is defined, deeply comparing an Energy-Distance Collaborative Strategy (EDCS) with a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) global optimization strategy. Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations reveal three profound insights: (1) It quantitatively verifies the nonlinear decoupling characteristic where operational collapse precedes topological disintegration; (2) Although DRL approaches short-term recovery limits, EDCS untangles the “energy-latency-effectiveness” trilemma. By reducing energy consumption by 45% and latency by 35%, EDCS achieves long-term sustainable resilience; (3) Microscopic node contribution analysis (peak contribution 238.9%) mechanistically quantifies the nonlinear emergent gains triggered by heterogeneous functional reorganization. This study provides rigorous mathematical support for designing high-survivability, self-adaptive UAV Kill Webs. Compared with topology-centered robustness metrics and purely learning-driven reconfiguration policies, the proposed framework jointly models physical feasibility, heterogeneous functional substitution, and temporal recovery loss within a unified resilience-analysis process.
References
[1] Liu W, Pan Z, Han W, Su X, Yu D, Wan B. Construction of kill webs with heterogeneous UAV swarms in dynamic contested environments. Complex Intell Syst 2025; 11(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01644-4
[2] Bai T, Wang D. Cooperative trajectory optimization for unmanned aerial vehicles in a combat environment. Sci China Inf Sci 2018; 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9537-1
[3] Wang H, Deng Y, Yoo S, Lin Y. Exploring robust features for improving adversarial robustness. IEEE Trans Cybern 2024; 54(9): 5141–5151. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2024.3380437
[4] Tushar W, Saha TK, Yuen C, Smith D, Poor HV. Peer-to-peer trading in electricity networks: an overview. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2020; 11(4): 3185-3200. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2020.2969657
[5] Li Y, Chen Z, Yin Y, Peeta S. Deployment of roadside units to overcome connectivity gap in transportation networks with mixed traffic. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol 2020; 111: 496-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.001
[6] Shojaeinasab A, et al. Intelligent manufacturing execution systems: A systematic review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2022; 62: 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.004
[7] Lv C, Yuan Z, Si S, Duan D. Robustness of scale-free networks with dynamical behavior against multi-node perturbation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 152: 111420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111420
[8] Deng Y, Wang Z, Xiao Y, Shen X, Kurths J, Wu J. Spatial network disintegration based on spatial coverage. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2025; 253: 110525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110525
[9] Gonçalves P, Sobral J, Ferreira LA. Unmanned aerial vehicle safety assessment modelling through petri Nets. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2017; 167: 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.021
[10] Artime O, et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks. Nat Rev Phys 6(2): 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00676-y
[11] Liu Y, Wang X, Su Z, Xiao Y, Wang Z. Efficient Edge Immunization Strategies for Diffusion Containment in Social Networks. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 2025; pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2025.3629028
[12] Chen P, Qi M, Yan L, Duan X. Diffusion capacity analysis of complex network based on the cluster distribution. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2024; 178: 114329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114329
[13] Schneider CM, Moreira AA, Andrade JS, Havlin S, Herrmann HJ. Mitigation of malicious attacks on networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(10): 3838-3841. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009440108
[14] Wang Y, Tao J, Zhang X, Bai G, Zhang Y. Mission-oriented capability evaluation for combat network based on operation loops. Def Technol 2024; 42: 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2024.07.002
[15] Song Z, Zhu J, Chen K. Robustness analysis of smart manufacturing systems against resource failures: a two-layered network perspective. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2025; 253: 110595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110595
[16] Hao Y, Jia L, Zio E, Wang Y, He Z. A multi-objective optimization model for identifying groups of critical elements in a high-speed train. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2023; 235: 109220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109220
[17] Cao X-B, Hong C, Du W-B, Zhang J. Improving the network robustness against cascading failures by adding links. Chaos Solitons Fractals 57: 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2013.08.007
[18] Gao S, Zhang S, Chen X. Effects of adding edges on the consensus convergence rate of weighted directed chain networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2025; pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2025.3527603
[19] Lou Y, Wang L, Chen G. Enhancing controllability robustness of q-snapback networks through redirecting edges. Research 2019; 2019: 7857534. https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/7857534
[20] Li Y, Zhang Z, He Z, Sun Q. A Heuristic Task Allocation Method Based on Overlapping Coalition Formation Game for Heterogeneous UAVs. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2024; 11(17): 28945-28959 https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2024.3406336
[21] Zhang C, Zhou W, Qin W, Tang W. A novel UAV path planning approach: heuristic crossing search and rescue optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 2023; 215: 119243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119243
[22] Oubbati OS, Lakas A, Guizani M. Multiagent deep reinforcement learning for wireless-powered UAV networks. IEEE Internet Things J 2022; 9(17): 16044-16059. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3,2024150616
[23] Yang B, et al. Jellyfish search algorithm based optimal thermoelectric generation array reconfiguration under non-uniform temperature distribution condition. Renewable Energy 2023; 204: 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.067
[24] Ning G, Xu R, Xiong C, Li M, Li J, Yang K. RSR-SESoS: a robust space resilience enhancement framework in spatial equipment system-of-systems. Expert Syst Appl 2025; 285: 127966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127966
[25] Wang Y, et al. Aviation armament system-of-systems modeling and identification method of vulnerable nodes based on interdependent network, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 37: 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.07.040
[26] Morone F, Makse HA. Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation. Nature 2015; 524(7563): 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14604
[27] Gu W, Yang C, Li L, Hou J, Radicchi F. Deep-learning-aided dismantling of interdependent networks. Nat Mach Intell 2025; 7(8): pp. 1266-1277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-025-01070-2
[28] Saleu RGM, Deroussi L, Feillet D, Grangeon N, Quilliot A. The parallel drone scheduling problem with multiple drones and vehicles. Eur J Oper Res 300(2): 571-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.08.014
[29] Ibrahim M, Hashmi US, Nabeel M, Imran A, Ekin S. Embracing complexity: agent-based modeling for HetNets design and optimization via concurrent reinforcement learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Netw Service Manag 18(4): 4042-4062. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsm.2021.3121282
[30] Wang Z, Fan J, Jiang G-P, Cao J, Xiao M, Alsaedi A. Consensus in nonlinear multi-agent systems with nonidentical nodes and sampled-data control. Sci China Inf Sci 2018; 61(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9441-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yezhuo Xu, Husheng Wu, Zizheng Han (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
