Estimation of Mid-Air Collision Risk in High-Density Airspace Using Hexagonal Spatial Indexing
Keywords:
Air Navigation, Air Traffic Management, Collision Risk, Intelligent Transport Systems, Spatial IndexingAbstract
Civil aviation safety remains a foundational element of the modern air transport system. Each of air transportation services must be delivered in compliance with the minimum required safety levels. Contemporary safety assessment frameworks typically integrate the cumulative impact of hazardous factors on the nominal functioning of the air transport system, with detailed analyses often employing tree-structured models of risk propagation. Among all operational hazards, the risk of mid-air collision is one of the most critical, particularly given the sustained global growth in air traffic demand. Increasing aircraft density within constrained airspace volumes requires new analytical methods capable of supporting both safety assurance and efficient airspace utilization. This paper presents a comparative study of two collision-risk models suitable for airspace safety analysis. The first model explicitly incorporates three-dimensional airspace volume, while the second aggregates risk across vertical and horizontal planes. To enhance computational scalability, a hierarchical hexagonal spatial indexing system is applied for the rapid identification of potentially conflicting aircraft pairs. The resulting hybrid framework provides high-speed and accurate detection of potential conflicts, making it a valuable instrument for the modernization of air traffic management, particularly in increasingly complex environments involving both manned and unmanned aircraft. The proposed methodology is validated using ADS-B observational data from German airspace.
References
[1] Kochenderfer M, Griffith D, Olszta J. On estimating mid-air collision risk. In 10th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations (ATIO) conference 2010; pp. 9333.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-9333
[2] Brooker P. Reducing mid-air collision risk in controlled airspace: Lessons from hazardous incidents. Safety Science 2005; 43(9): 715-738.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.02.006
[3] A Unified Framework for Collision Risk Modelling in Support of the Manual on Airspace Planning Methodology for the Determination of Separation Minima, Doc. 9689, ICAO, 2009.
[4] Bak S, Tran HD. Neural network compression of ACAS Xu early prototype is unsafe: Closed-loop verification through quantized state backreachability. In NASA Formal Methods Symposium 2022; pp. 280-298. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06773-0_15
[5] Ivashchuk O, Ostroumov I. Estimation of Mid-Air Collision Risk Based on ADS-B Trajectory Data. In International Workshop on Advances in Civil Aviation Systems Development 2025; pp. 305-318. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91992-3_20
[6] Ostroumov IV, Ivashchuk O, Kuzmenko NS. Preliminary Estimation of war Impact in Ukraine on the Global Air Transportation. In 12th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT) 2022; pp. 281-284.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT54803.2022.9913092
[7] Su Y, Yan X. A risk assessment method for mid-air collisions in urban air mobility operations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2025; 10(2); 1327-1341.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2024.3426915
[8] Kaya K, Pinder J, Watkinson B, Ansell D, Vinning K, Moore L, Gilbert C, Sujit A, Jones D. Toward mid-air collision-free trajectory for autonomous and pilot-controlled unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Access 2023; 11: 100323-100342.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2024.3426915
[9] Fricke H, Forster S, Bruhl R, Austen WJ, Thiel C. Mid-air collisions with drones. In USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2021) 2021.
[10] Hexagonal hierarchical geospatial indexing system specification. Available online: https://h3geo.org
[11] Aini AN, Dewantari OA, Mandala DP, Bisri MB. An Enhanced Earthquake Risk Analysis using H3 Spatial Indexing. 927 IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023; 1245(1): 012014.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1245/1/012014 928
[12] Air traffic management, Procedures for Air Navigation Services, Doc. 4444, ICAO, 2016.
[13] Majka A, Pasich A. Cross-border Free Route Airspace concept and its impact on flight efficiency improvement. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022; 1226(1): 012022.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1226/1/012022
[14] Nagaoka S. A model for estimating the lateral overlap probability of aircraft with RNP alerting capability in parallel RNAV routes. ICAS Secretariat – 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2008, Anchorage, AK, United States 2008; 1: 3590-3597
[15] Mori R. Identifying the ratio of aircraft applying SLOP by statistical modeling of lateral deviation, Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences 2011; 54(183): 30-36.
https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.54.30
[16] Minda A, Cur K. The new airspace model for flight planning at free route airspace. Aviation and Security 2024; 6(2): 5-18.
https://doi.org/10.55676/asi.v6i2.38
[17] Endoh S. Aircraft collision models. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1982. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15746
[18] The OpenSky Network. https://opensky-network.org.
