A Review of Statistical Modeling and Inference Methods for UAV Airborne Sensors: From State Estimation to Probabilistic Uncertainty Perception

Authors

  • Yafei Song School of Statistics and Data Science, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi’an 710100, China Author
  • Zhuoyong Shi School of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore Author
  • Zhuoyong Shi School of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore Author

Keywords:

UAV, airborne sensor, statistical modeling, state estimation, multi-sensor fusion, uncertainty perception

Abstract

The autonomous flight capability of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in complex dynamic environments highly depends on the accurate perception of the environment and their own state by onboard sensors. However, limited by sensor noise, model mismatch, observation heterogeneity, and external environmental disturbances, the output of onboard sensors inherently possesses significant uncertainty and randomness. How to transform imperfect, multi-source, and asynchronous sensor observations into reliable state estimation and environmental cognition results through statistical modeling and inference methods has become one of the core issues in UAV perception system research. This paper systematically reviews the development of research related to UAV onboard sensors from a statistical perspective, focusing on the application and evolution of statistical modeling, state estimation, and multi-sensor fusion methods in UAV perception systems. First, it summarizes the typical statistical observation models and noise characteristics of inertial sensors, satellite navigation, vision, lidar, and novel neuromorphic sensors, and analyzes key statistical issues such as random walk, non-Gaussian noise, and time-dependent errors. Subsequently, based on the Bayesian state estimation framework, this paper systematically reviews the application progress of Kalman filtering, error state filtering, particle filtering, and robust statistical methods in UAV navigation and localization, and compares and analyzes the statistical nature of loosely coupled and tightly coupled multi-sensor fusion strategies. Building upon this, it further discusses joint probabilistic modeling methods for heterogeneous sensors such as vision, inertial, and radar, as well as the fusion trend of statistical learning and deep models in high-dimensional perception tasks. Finally, this paper summarizes the role and limitations of statistical methods in UAV airborne sensor research and looks forward to future development directions oriented towards uncertainty perception (the capability to explicitly quantify the reliability of perception results), risk-constrained decision-making (strategies that incorporate estimation variance into control loops to ensure operational safety), and integrated sensing-computing architectures.

References

[1] Pajares G. Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing2015; 81(4): 281-330.

https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.4.281

[2] Shi Z, Yang L, Wu Y, Wang D, Zhang J, Zhang A. Design of motion pattern recognition system based on artificial intelligence methods. In 2023 International Conference on Cyber-Physical Social Intelligence (ICCSI). IEEE2023; pp. 233-237.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSI58851.2023.10303805

[3] Korpela C, Orsag M, Pekala M, Oh P. Dynamic stability of a mobile manipulating unmanned aerial vehicle. In 2013 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE 2013; pp. 4922-4927.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631280

[4] Khadka A, Fick B, Afshar A, Tavakoli M, Baqersad J. Non-contact vibration monitoring of rotating wind turbines using a semi-autonomous UAV. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing2020; 138: 106446.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106446

[5] Bayomi N, Fernandez JE. Eyes in the sky: Drones applications in the built environment under climate change challenges. Drones2023; 7(10): 637.

https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7100637

[6] Liu Y, Zhou J, Tian D, Sheng Z, Duan X, Qu G, Leung VC. Joint communication and computation resource scheduling of a UAV-assisted mobile edge computing system for platooning vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems2021; 23(7): 8435-8450.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3082539

[7] Zhang J, Shi Z, Zhang A, Yang Q, Shi G, Wu Y. UAV trajectory prediction based on flight state recognition. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems2023; 60(3): 2629-2641.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2023.3303854

[8] Shi Z, Shi G, Zhang J, Wang D, Xu T, Ji L, Wu Y. Design of UAV flight state recognition system for multisensor data fusion. IEEE Sensors Journal2024; 24(13): 21386-21394.

https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3394883

[9] Fong WT, Ong SK, Nee AYC. Methods for in-field user calibration of an inertial measurement unit without external equipment. Measurement Science and Technology2008; 19(8): 085202.

https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/8/085202

[10] Lin YC, Cheng YT, Zhou T, Ravi R, Hasheminasab SM, Flatt JE, Habib A. Evaluation of UAV LiDAR for mapping coastal environments. Remote Sensing2019; 11(24): 2893.

https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242893

[11] Furgale P, Rehder J, Siegwart R. Unified temporal and spatial calibration for multi-sensor systems. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE2013; pp. 1280-1286.

https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696514

[12] Shi Z, Jia Y, Shi G, Zhang K, Ji L, Wang D, Wu Y. Design of motor skill recognition and hierarchical evaluation system for table tennis players. IEEE Sensors Journal 2024; 24(4): 5303-5315.

https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3346880

[13] Li N, Shi Z, Jin J, Feng J, Zhang A, Xie M,Lei Y. Design of Intelligent Firefighting and Smart Escape Route Planning System Based on Improved Ant Colony Algorithm. Sensors 2024; 24(19): 6438.

https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196438

[14] Song Y, Zhang S, Wang Y, Shi Z. AI and Statistical Theory–Driven Wearable System for Intelligent Recognition of Professional Table Tennis Skills. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering 2025; 2025(1).

https://doi.org/10.1155/mse/5998003

[15] Guo J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Liu X, Zhou S, Shi G, Shi Z. Formation Cooperative Intelligent Tactical Decision Making Based on Bayesian Network Model. Drones 2024; (2504-446X): 8(9).

https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8090427

[16] Mao G, Drake S, Anderson BD. Design of an extended kalman filter for uav localization. In 2007 Information, Decision and Control. IEEE 2007; pp. 224-229.

https://doi.org/10.1109/IDC.2007.374554

[17] Gao S, Zhong Y, Zhang X, Shirinzadeh B. Multi-sensor optimal data fusion for INS/GPS/SAR integrated navigation system. Aerospace Science and Technology2009; 13(4-5): 232-237.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2009.04.006

[18] Debeunne C, Vivet D. A review of visual-LiDAR fusion based simultaneous localization and mapping. Sensors2020; 20(7): 2068.

https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072068

[19] Jefferys WH, Fitzpatrick MJ, McArthur BE.GaussFit—A system for least squares and robust estimation. Celestial Mechanics1987; 41(1-4): 39-49.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238750

[20] Park S, Gil MS, Im H, Moon YS. Measurement noise recommendation for efficient Kalman filtering over a large amount of sensor data. Sensors2019; 19(5): 1168.

https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051168

[21] Shi Z, Zhang J, Shi G, Ji L, Wang D, Wu Y. Design of a UAV trajectory prediction system based on multi-flight modes. Drones2024; 8(6): 255.

https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8060255

[22] Shi Z, Zhang J, Shi G, Zhu M, Ji L, Wu Y. Autonomous UAV Safety Oriented Situation Monitoring and Evaluation System. Drones 2024; 8(7): 308.

https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8070308

[23] Shi Z, Liu M, Yang Q, Liu J, Wang D, Zhang J. Autonomous security evaluation model for UAV based on airborne information. In 2023 6th International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP). IEEE 2023; pp. 785-789.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICSP59554.2023.10390620

[24] Zhang Y, Xu W, Ye H, Shi Z. A two-stage optimization framework for UAV fleet sizing and task allocation in emergency logistics using the GWO and CBBA. Drones 2025; 9(7): 501.

https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9070501

[25] Höflinger F, Müller J, Zhang R, Reindl LM, Burgard W. A wireless micro inertial measurement unit (IMU). IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement2013; 62(9): 2583-2595.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2013.2255977

[26] Furgale P, Rehder J, Siegwart R. Unified temporal and spatial calibration for multi-sensor systems. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE2013; pp. 1280-1286.

https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696514

[27] Caballero-Águila R, García-Garrido I, Linares-Pérez J. Information fusion algorithms for state estimation in multi-sensor systems with correlated missing measurements. Applied Mathematics and Computation2014; 226: 548-563.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.10.068

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles